Article 132 UCMJ
Military Defense Attorney for Article 132 Violations
Members of the U.S. armed forces operate under a specific set of rules detailed in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). This Code is similar to the U.S. Constitution for the general public, as it lists different articles that cover specific rights and violations of military law. However, the standards within the UCMJ Articles are frequently more stringent than those in the Constitution, given the heightened moral and behavioral expectations placed on military personnel.
If a military individual does not meet these rigorous standards, they can face charges under the UCMJ. One such charge revolves around the act ofretaliation. Here, experienced North Carolina military defense lawyer Aden Wilkie from the The Wilkie Law Group covers UCMJ Article 132, which addresses retaliation-related offenses within the military.
What is Article 132 of the UCMJ?
Article 132 of the UCMJ (10 U.S.C. 932) covers the criminal offense of Retaliation in the military. This UCMJ rule addresses the misuse of otherwise lawful military authority to retaliate against someone for reporting a crime or for sharing protected information. It’s an offense to take, threaten, or withhold actions with the intention of retaliation or to discourage someone from reporting a crime or sharing such information. Anyone under the UCMJ can commit this offense if they misuse their authority in personnel matters with this specific intent. However, this rule doesn’t prevent the legitimate use of command authority to discipline or reward service members.
The exact text from the Manual for Courts-Martial is as follows:
“Any person subject to this chapter who, with the intent to retaliate against any person for reporting or planning to report a criminal offense, or making or planning to make a protected communication, or with the intent to discourage any person from reporting a criminal offense or making or planning to make a protected communication—
(1) wrongfully takes or threatens to take an adverse personnel action against any person; or
(2) wrongfully withholds or threatens to withhold a favorable personnel action with respect to any person;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
-
Mr. Wilkie literally saved my family.
- Cody M."The first thing Mr. Wilkie will tell you is that “no one will out-work me”. That is an understatement. He took my case on short notice, and after three years of dealing with the prospect of life-altering charges, he presented an effective case that showed the jury the facts, despite the best efforts of the state to paint me in a negative light.
Mr. Wilkie literally saved my family, and I cannot express how thankful I am to have trusted him."
Recent Case Results
-
Assault on a Female
All Charges Dismissed
-
Child Pornography
Successful Plea Deal
-
Domestic Violence Protection Order
Charges Dropped
-
Drug Trafficking
Charges Dropped
-
Drug Trafficking
All Charges Dismissed
-
Drugs
All Charges Dismissed